‘So what?’ Trump attorney Jay Sekulow dismisses second whistleblower coming forward

2 min


fox news today news breaking news of the day news bbc

President Trump’s lawyer pink-slipped the looks of a second whistle-blower in reference to his Gregorian calendar month telephone with the president of country.

Jay Sekulow told “Hannity” on Monday that by the White House cathartic the decision transcript it renders future whistleblowers moot.

“They’re currently talking a few second whistle-blower, and my statement thereon is: ‘so what’,” he said.

“We’ve already discharged a transcript. Is it very relevant what another one who could or might not have detected the speech thought of it?”

IG couldn’t justify 18-DAY WINDOW BETWEEN country decision AND whistle-blower COMPLAINT: SOURCES

Sekulow: The transcript is already out, second whistle-blower has nothingVideo
Sekulow aforesaid Trump’s critics area unit impatient to search out any scandal they’ll pin on him, particularly one that would result in official document.

“They could not get Russia, they could not get obstruction,” he said.

More from Media
George Papadopoulos claims alternative nations had ‘vested interest’ against Trump’s ‘America First’ platform in 2016
Trump legal document ruling ‘obliterated’ president’s argument, choose Napolitano says
“Then it absolutely was quid professional quo with country.”

Sekulow continued dismissing the second whistleblower’s look, inform to however the primary whistle-blower had contact with workers from Rep. Adam Schiff’s, D-Calif., House Intelligence Committee.

He claimed the whistle-blower neglected to inform the officer he had interacted with Schiff’s team.

“So now, what can we have, a second whistle-blower. Again, the transcript’s out, it speaks for itself — it is not Associate in Nursing impeachable offense, period,” he said.

Attorney Mark Zaid, UN agency represents each whistleblowers, initial told first rudiment News that the second individual is – just like the initial whistle-blower – Associate in Nursing intelligence official, and has primary information of sure allegations contained within the initial whistle-blower criticism, that wasn’t supported any primary information.


What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
0
hate
confused confused
0
confused
fail fail
0
fail
fun fun
0
fun
geeky geeky
0
geeky
love love
0
love
lol lol
0
lol
omg omg
0
omg
win win
0
win

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.